Interactive visualization platform for accelerating multi-discipline coordination and clash resolution — turning fragmented reports into actionable insights.
Coordination meetings are the heartbeat of successful BIM projects, yet teams often struggle with fragmented clash reports from Navisworks, making it difficult to prioritize issues and track resolution progress across multiple disciplines and project phases.
Before: Scattered Clash Reports → After: Centralized Dashboard
I developed an interactive dashboard that aggregates clash detection data from Navisworks exports, categorizes issues by severity and discipline, and provides real-time analytics to make coordination meetings more efficient and actionable.
Interactive charts and graphs showing clash distribution, trends, and resolution progress.
Smart categorization by severity to focus on critical issues first during meetings.
Filter clashes by architectural, structural, or MEP disciplines for targeted review.
Monitor resolution status per cycle and identify workflow bottlenecks in real-time.
Generate professional PDF/CSV reports for stakeholders with a single click.
Track clash trends across project phases with timeline and trend analysis views.
The dashboard transformed coordination meetings from lengthy status reviews into focused, action-oriented sessions that drove measurable improvements in clash resolution.
Interviewed coordination team, analyzed Navisworks reports, and wireframed dashboard layout.
Built data ingestion pipeline and created interactive visualizations with Chart.js.
Implemented priority filtering, discipline views, and trend analysis panels.
User testing with coordination team, refined UX based on real meeting feedback.
Deployed to project team and conducted training sessions across disciplines.
"This dashboard has significantly improved our coordination meetings. We can now see exactly where we stand at a glance and focus our time on solving problems rather than reading through reports. The historical trends help us identify issues early."
The most valuable features came from observing actual coordination meetings, not assumptions.
Initial designs were too complex — removing features and simplifying improved usability significantly.
Desktop testing missed critical issues that appeared on tablets used on construction sites.
Color coding for priority made critical issues immediately visible — reducing triage time by 70%.
Direct import without CSV export step
Assign clashes with email notifications
Native app for on-site resolution
Predict resolution time from history
I'd be happy to demo the dashboard and discuss how similar visualization tools can improve your project coordination workflows.